G.Audi j 30 nov 2006 masstables/Ame2003/Ame2003.errata Errata in the Ame2003 publication p.131 1.2 Highlights line 2 read "diagram of atomic number Z versus neutron number N [8]." ackn. C. Guénaut Three references were not printed: p.592 1963Th03 PHRVA 129, 1778 T.T.Thwaites p.592 1964Da16 PLRBA 136, 1240 H.Daniel, G.Th.Kaschl, H.Schmitt, K.Springer p.609 1976Cr03 PYLBB 64, 143 G.M.Crawley, W.F.Steele, J.N.Bishop, P.A.Smith, S.Maripuu 76Se (see AMDC newsletter May 2004: 76Se from SMILETRAP DRAFT-29-apr-2004 In the process of the mass evaluation, the evaluator must always be carefull to use only the primary information. While doing this, unfortunately, an accident occurred in the Ame2003 for the publication of 2001Do08. In this paper three results were given for 76Ge, 76Se and for their difference (of higher precision, due to drastically reduced systematic uncertainties in their combination). We should have used the 76Se and the 76Ge-76Se result and not the 76Ge in order not to use twice the same info. Unfortunately, in the process we accidentaly dropped also 76Se. Using this 76Se result will give, as expected, improved values in both 76Se and 76Ge mass-excesses: 76 Ge = -73212.863 (0.091) keV 76 Se = -75251.866 (0.075) keV We apologize for any resulting inconveniency for the user, and to the Smiletrap team who has done a wonderful work. Errata in the Ame2003 files on the web PAIRING ENERGIES (cf. bulletin amdc.061 of January 2006) In Ame'93 and Ame2003 we calculated pairing energies in tables available from the AMDC web (not published material): http://amdc.in2p3.fr/masstables/Ame1993/rct3_rmd.mas93 http://amdc.in2p3.fr/masstables/Ame2003/rct7.mas03 The quantities Dnn and Dpp are the neutron and proton pairing energies as defined in Ame'83, p.56. Unfortunately, the values given for the neutron-proton pairing energies (written Dnp in Ame'93, Pa in Ame2003) in these files do not correspond to the definition in Ame'83, p.56, but to an older definition which used only 2 Sd (deuton separation energies): 1/2(-1)**(Z)[-Sd(A+2,Z+1)+Sd(A,Z)] instead of 3: 1/4(-1)**(Z+1)[Sd(A+2,Z+1)-2Sd(A,Z)+Sd(A-2,Z-1)] Although the formula with 2 Sd is still correct, we believe the formula with 3 Sd to be better. We kindly ask those to used these np-pairing to accept our apologize, and be informed that the physics they derived from them is essentially unchanged. We thank Pr. Till von Egidy for pointing out the problem.